Critical Mass: Jail Time for Biking
by Mark Mardon
"We find ourselves
at a critical point in the evolution of American cities, and the main enemy
of green cities is, in fact, the private car. And the car is everywhere
triumphant. Indeed cities everywhere on Earth, not just in America, are
being overrun by cars. The greatest cities that humans have contrived in
the whole history of our species are in danger. And here, cars are multiplying
faster than people. They're out-breathing us, too. They're using up our
land area. They're using up our economic strength."
- Ecotopia, by Ernest
Callenbach (Banyon Tree Books, 1975)
I was one of the
115 bicyclists arrested in the July 25 Critical Mass bicycle-vs.-car demonstration
in San Francisco, which drew somewhere between 5,000 and 10,000 riders.
I got a traffic citation for allegedly running a red light, then I was arrested,
right after the ticket - Wham-bam! - in a two-block span downtown. Double
whammy!
I pulled no outrageous
stunts, yelled at no automobile drivers, spat at no one, but I got nabbed
twice anyway. I was caught in the financial district, between Sansome and
Montgomery streets, in a police dragnet that riot squads used to corral
and arrest us for unlawful assembly and failure to disperse - though how
we could have dispersed, given that they blocked us in, is beyond me.
The group I went
to jail with was made up of decent people - ordinary working citizens; not
thugs, malcontents or professional agitators - who merely wanted to make
a statement about the lack of consideration given to bicyclists in the city.
The sole reason we were entrapped, handcuffed, put in paddy wagons, separated
from our bikes and hauled off to the holding tank was that Mayor Willie
Brown and the police needed to flex their muscles and demonstrate their
willingness to crack down. We were their token victims.
I did not seek to
be arrested in order to make a statement. Indeed, I was about to head home
when the cops came roaring up and forced me to dismount.
I'm not usually
an activist and have never been arrested before. In fact, I own and sometimes
drive a car in the city (always being respectful of bicyclists). But Mayor
Brown's rude, ignorant comments (he blasted the bicyclists' "arrogance"
and declared "war" on their monthly "Critical Mass"
ride) and attitude (he arrived at the July 25 rally in a limousine, then
proceeded to dismiss his critics as irrelevant nonvoters), the provocative
actions of the police (who abandoned their traditional role as peaceful
Critical Mass escorts to intimidate and assault both bike riders and bystanders),
and the angry attitude of motorists left me feeling very, very angry.
I've always shied
away from demonstrations because I didn't want to get arrested and because
I hate making a scene. But now, having gone to jail with so many committed
people, I want to make sure justice prevails.
Critical Mass
Media
I'm not at all surprised
at the highly negative spin the major television and print media put on
this event. It was inevitable. The major media, especially TV news, are
bound and gagged by the auto industry - their major source of ad revenues.
According to the
most recent report from Advertising Age, General Motors, Chrysler and Ford
ranked third, seventh and 10th, respectively, as the nation's leading advertisers
in 1995. In that year alone, GM spent more than $2 billion on television,
newspaper, magazine and radio ads. Chrysler was the leading spot TV advertiser
in 1995, while GM ranked third.
When was the last
time you read or viewed a significant critique of America's car culture?
It doesn't happen in the mainstream press. Media corporations can't afford
to be critical of cars (except for particular models that tend to explode,
tip over or have some other glaring safety defect) or car culture. I have
firsthand insight why this is so:
When I was an editor
at Sierra (the Sierra Club's national magazine), I prepared a seven-page
feature that critiqued automobiles from many angles, enumerating their damaging
impacts on the environment - both natural and social - and suggesting alternatives
such as car-free inner cities (see "Cars Cars Cars Cars Cars,"
Sierra, May/June 1989). The response from Detroit auto manufacturers
- Chrysler and GM advertised heavily in the magazine at that time - was
swift and punishing.
As soon as the issue
appeared in people's mailboxes, Sierra's advertising representative
in Detroit was called on the carpet by the automakers. They reamed both
him and the managing publisher, telling them that the magazine had gone
too far and would suffer as a result.
The auto manufacturers
immediately pulled their ads and vowed never to advertise in Sierra's pages
again (which, of course, many members of the Sierra Club would consider
a good thing). The boycott cost the magazine some $600,000 in revenues.
It forced the editor-in-chief and managing publisher to toe the line thereafter
lest they offend automakers, and a short time later, the editors ran an
upbeat feature on car camping.
Throughout the fracas,
Japanese automakers continued to advertise in Sierra. Apparently
they didn't take our criticism so personally. But US automakers boycotted
the magazine for years. Eventually they came back, but only after Sierra
had "behaved" for a long time.
(To its credit,
Sierra recently ran a special issue on "Livable Cities"
[May/June 1997], which promoted the creation of "pedestrian pockets"
prohibiting automobile traffic within cities - precisely what San Francisco
needs to do with its entire downtown area.)
This is the kind
of power the automobile industry holds over the media. The editor who dares
publish or broadcast a story critical of America's car culture stands to
be called on the carpet by the automakers who hold the media hostage.
Mark Mardon,
a freelance writer based in San Francisco, still rides his bike to work.