Fall 1997
Vol. 12, No. 4

German Activist Sued by Monsanto

Germany via EcoNet (January 22) - I was sued last winter by the US agrochemical corporation Monsanto for distributing an announcement on GENESIS, a German mailing list concerned with novel food.

I received a message from Greenpeace activists in Duesseldorf who were preparing a demonstration against Monsanto Germany on November 25, 1996 to protest the import of RR-Soya, Monsanto's genetically engineered soy beans. It was the first time that a genetically engineered organism had been used in processed foods imported into the European common market.

I decided to post the announcement to the mailing list. Two days later, I received a letter from a German lawyer representing Monsanto. It stated that I had distributed a proclamation on the Internet calling Monsanto a "corporation of poisons, genes and swindle." (The slogan came from the Greenpeace activists.)

Monsanto claimed that I offended the company with the word "swindle" and endangered their creditworthiness. They gave me three days to sign a declaration promising never again to say: "Monsanto, the corporation of swindle." Every time I repeated this sentence, I would have to pay Monsanto 100,000 DM ($66,666).

I sent Monsanto's lawyer a fax refusing to sign the declaration because (1) I was not the author of the proclamation, and (2) the opinions expressed are sheltered by the German constitution.

Monsanto asked a Duesseldorf court for a ruling that would forbid me to speak or write the sentence. The court granted a preliminary judgment, ruling that if I repeated the sentence, I would have to pay 500,000 DM ($333,333) or spend six months in prison.

Monsanto argued that because the proclamation was distributed on the Internet, anyone with an Internet connection could read the message. But the GENESIS e-mail list had only 24 members and wasn't directly reachable from the Internet.

How did Monsanto know about the proclamation? Court proceedings revealed that Monsanto's public relations in Germany are performed by the New York company Young & Rubicam (Y&R). A so-called "Internet counselor" from Y&R who subscribed to GENESIS received the proclamation in the US. From there, the message was redirected to the Y&R subsidiary in Frankfurt, which faxed the proclamation to Monsanto Germany in Duesseldorf.

In court, the Y&R Internet counselor declared that he read an explanation of how to subscribe to GENESIS on one of my web pages, and he presented a copy of said page. But everyone could see that the page was about GENTECH, not GENESIS. (It was part of Monsanto's argument that GENESIS could be accessed from the Internet.)

On January 8, 1997, all of Monsanto's claims were rejected. I won. Monsanto has to pay the court costs.

I still wonder why Monsanto sued me. Other people are calling Monsanto's artificial sweetener aspartame a "deadly poison" without being sued. I think the reason is the campaign against RR-Soya. Public opinion and media coverage were not in favor of the genetically engineered food. Maybe Monsanto feared a strong demonstration and tried everything to stifle upcoming protest.

- Werner Reisberger

Schoellmannstr 20, D-44807 Bochum, Germany, (49) 234 540294, fax: -540239, werner@tribe.ping.de.