California's Commercial Spaceport Rises on Native Land
by Dr. John M. Anderson
The State of California and the aerospace industry have joined forces to create the
California Commercial Spaceport (CCS) near Santa Barbara. The spaceport is
being built on 100 coastal acres leased from Vandenberg Air Force Base – on land
once the homeland of the ancient Chumash Indian nation.
Vandenberg AFB covers a vast area of coast containing numerous Chumash
religious shrines and the remains of the ancient Chumash towns of Xoqto and
Saspili. The spaceport is being constructed at Point Conception, which is a
Chumash site known as Humqaq (meaning “The Raven Comes”). The Chumash
believe that it was at Humqaq that the souls of the dead left the Earth to begin their
journey to heaven.
For more than 30 years, military rocket launches and space shuttle missions have
rained toxic chemicals and sonic booms over the coastal lands and waters of
ancient Chumasia. More distant landmarks, including the sacred Chumash peak
Iwihimnu (Pine Mountain) and the Tejon Indian Reservation, where many
Chumash once lived, have also been affected by sonic booms from the space
shuttle.
Rattlesnake Shelter, an important Chumash religious [sacred?] site near the
spaceport that has been studied by many scholars, was not mentioned in the
spaceport’s first environmental impact report. Seen from a distance, the quartz
banding in the rock face reflects the sun with a mysterious light. Rock art at the
site, consisting of fine lines cut into areas of red ochre, includes ancient white-on-
red images depicting a European ship and anchor.
Prior to the arrival of Europeans (and the cultural genocide of the California
Catholic mission system), the Chumash were one of the largest native groups in
the western US. Today, 200 descendants of the Tsmala Chumash inhabit the 99-
acre Santa Ynez Reservation, the only federally recognized Chumash reservation
in the US. The majority of the 3,000 descendants of the Chumash live outside the
reservation and lack both land and federal recognition.
A $60 Trillion Race to the Moon
The recent discovery of ice on the moon has accelerated the race to build
commercial spaceports. The presence of water means the moon’s mineral wealth
can be extracted at a much lower cost than previously predicted. Water on the
moon also can be converted into low-cost rocket fuel, enabling aerospace
corporations to use the moon as a staging ground for commercial exploitation of
Mars.
Last March, a report by a group of leading US space scientists estimated the
minimum value of the ice on the moon at $60 trillion. NASA predicts that water
extracted from a football-field-sized plot of lunar rock could sustain six astronauts
for ten years.
The Christian Science Monitor followed up by estimating the amount of water on
the moon to be enough to “enable a modest amount of colonization for centuries.”
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), chair of the House Subcommittee on Space and
Aeronautics, reacted to the news by declaring: “American pioneers didn’t bring
lumber and food west in their covered wagons; they brought axes and plows and
built a life off the land. Now we know that the same will be possible as we move
into the solar system, starting with the moon.”
Japan is set to launch a mission to probe the moon’s surface in 1999, with
Russia, China, Europe, and two private US companies set to follow in 2000.
Several nations and six US states – New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, Virginia,
Alaska and California – are competing to build a new generation of private, for-
profit spaceports.
Suddenly, promises of immense profits for industry and increased revenues for
governments have stimulated a space race between the US, Russia, China and
Australia. The Chumash sacred site – believed to be the spot where souls depart
this world for the afterlife – is now slated to become the space industry’s
commercial ladder to the stars.
Dismissing Native Claims
The well-financed coalition between the aerospace industry, local and state
politicians, and big business has pushed ahead with spaceport construction without
consulting the Chumash or including them on their planning boards.
Due to a lack of media attention, the public has little understanding of the
seriousness of increasingly contentious relationships between the aerospace
industry and Native Americans. Also underexamined are the actions of economic
and political powers allied against the Chumash over the spaceport issue. Events
are moving so rapidly that the public may only learn about these power struggles
after the fact.
To address native claims, California Commercial Spaceport contracted with Dr.
L. Wilcoxon and Dr. B. Haley to research Chumash ethnohistory and the cultural
validity of religious shrines in the area near the spaceport. Their article, published
in the December, 1997 issue of Current Anthropology, also attacked the validity of
Chumash religious beliefs about Point Conception and suggested that Chumash
traditionalists – i.e., the majority of the state’s Chumash – should be left out of
formal state negotiations to identify and preserve Chumash religious and
archaeological sites.
Haley and Wilcoxon wrote that “Chumash Traditionalists lack the kinds of
biological and cultural linkages with the region’s aboriginal past that they claim –
few are descendants of the aboriginal inhabitants they consider their ancestors.”
The authors argued that the only legitimate Chumash Indians were the 200
“nontraditionalists” who are “descendants of the Catholic Indian communities in
San Luis Obispo, Santa Ynez, Santa Barbara, Ventura and Tejon.” The rationale
for this favoritism is that a large number of the ancestors of these people appear in
the California mission records. How sweet it would be for the aerospace industry
to deal only with this small band and to ignore nearly 3,000 other Californians
who identify themselves as Chumash.
Wilcoxon and Haley’s article seemed less an academically objective discussion
than a carefully laid-out argument for an industry challenge of the legal rights of
the Chumash majority to participate in site-monitoring. Publication of these
charges caused understandable concern among the many Chumash groups
concerned with cultural preservation.
Wilcoxon and Haley acknowledged that “A portion of our research was
performed under a contract with California Commercial Spaceports, Inc.,” but they
did not reveal the dollar-amount of their grant.
The Pipeline Precedent
The Wilcoxon/Haley article recalls a similar event from the 1980s. One of
California’s biggest environmental battles of that decade involved a plan to build a
massive Chevron liquefied natural gas (LNG) pipeline through western Chumash
lands. One of the most serious impediments to the development of Chevron’s
project was the presence of Chumash monitors at development sites.
In a 1989 article in the National Association for the Practice of Anthropology’s
NAPA Bulletin, Chevron’s principle anthropologist, Mary O’Connor, argued that
all contemporary Chumash groups lacked cultural validity. (O’Connor also
acknowledged the trouble and expense Chevron encountered working with
Chumash monitors at the construction sites.)
By dismissing all evidence of descent other than Catholic mission records,
O’Connor denied the Chumash self-determination of their tribal membership and
shifted authority to incomplete and culturally-biased records of hostile Spanish
and Mexican colonizers.
The result of these charges was confusion in the public’s mind over the proper
role of the Chumash in monitoring future sites. Weren’t any Chumash rights
protected under California laws governing monitoring activities? Why was a
representative for the oil industry challenging Chumash cultural identity so
aggressively?
There is a certain amount of racism implicit in the legal argument that ethnicity
must be dependent on European and Catholic rules of verification. One of the most
important powers any cultural group possesses is its ability to define its own
membership. If outsiders usurp this function, the group’s self-identity is
fundamentally compromised.
European imperialism was not gentle with the conquered peoples of the
Americas. All too often, Spanish, Mexican and US armies were allied with
proselytizing Christian churches. As a consequence, few native people volunteered
to reveal the full truth about their religion to hostile priests. The most sacred truths
were carefully hidden from the conquerors.
What this means for students of native California religion is that one cannot rely
solely upon ethnographic materials when trying to understand the ancient
theologies of the region. As a result of the ongoing repression of religious freedom
among defeated populations, ethnographic data captured only a fractured view of
the full richness of native thought.
Environmental Impacts
The western coast of Chumashia is ideal for a commercial spaceport, Chumashia
promotional literature advises, because it is ideally positioned to inject space
vehicles into a broad range of popular orbits. Best of all, no overflights will take
place over populated areas.
The promotional literature ignores the negative impacts that rocket launches will
have on coastal flora and fauna. Instead, investors are assured that they will
benefit from reduced environmental permit requirements engineered by pro-
industry legislators.
But what effect will the awesome sound of rocket liftoffs have on migrating
whales, on the critical ocean flyway that links birds from California and Mexico to
summer feeding grounds in the northern US and Canada, and on ocean mammals
that rest and breed on nearby beaches and downrange islands?
Chumash traditionalists are concerned about the environmental cost of the
spaceport in a region that is vital to the survival of many species, including the
whales and seals that frequent the coast. Spaceport operations will increase the
impact of sonic booms that can disturb both land and ocean-dwelling creatures.
The Guadalupe fur seal may prove a critical issue during future hearings on the
spaceport. This rare species has been reappearing on the islands near the spaceport
and is protected under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
If the commercial spaceport is fully developed, the Santa Ynez Valley and the
Santa Barbara coast could face growth similar to that which turned the San
Fernando Valley into a “little Los Angeles.”
Finally, there is the risk to people. The US Air Force is justly proud of a safety
record that, over the last 50 years, has seen no civilian population centers hit by
wayward rockets. An internal military document obtained by Florida Today
revealed serious concern among USAF officials that shifting safety responsibilities
to commercial interests could pose “potentially catastrophic consequences” for the
public. In the heat of a profit-oriented atmosphere, the document suggested, a
commercial operator might be tempted to try and recover control of an out-of-
control rocket, even when such a delay could run the risk of civilian casualties.
A Fast-Track to the Stars
The situation seems daunting for the Chumash and their supporters –
environmentalists and no-growth advocates – who are trying to preserve the
Chumash coast from further development. Many of the world’s largest and most
wealthy corporations [name them?] have allied themselves with local, state and
federal politicians as well as with top officials at Vandenberg AFB.
A number of aerospace giants such as Lockheed Martin and Boeing (and newly
emerging companies such as Kistler Aerospace and Pioneer Rocketplane) saw
potential for immense profits if they could obtain a position of leadership in the
California industry. In 1993, the California legislature enacted a law to exempt the
commercial space industry from state sales taxes. Supporters argued that the
special tax favors would bolster California’s competitiveness in aerospace; critics
described them as corporate welfare.
Spaceport Systems International (SSI), the company building the spaceport, is
owned by ITT Federated Services, a $9 billion (1996 figures) multinational
concern with vast influence in US state and federal governments. ITT’s contracts
include expansion of oil fields in Oman, joint-ventures with powerful Saudi
Arabian firms, development of radar facilities for the 30th Space Command and
commercial support for Vandenberg’s Ballistic Missile Defense Program (the
reincarnation of President Reagan’s “Star Wars” program).
One of SSI’s major goals has been to align government and private industry to
promote a pro-space business climate in California. SSI’s website boasts that this
effort includes a “public/private partnership [with]… over 20 aerospace and
support companies; the US Air Force; and the State of California.”
In 1996, California Rep. Tom Bordonaro (R-Paso Robles) authored Assembly
Bill 1240, which exempts commercial space launches from “mobile source” air
quality regulations. “Development of the commercial space industry depends to a
great extent on the existence of low-cost access to space,” Bordonaro explained.
Without such an exemption, it is unlikely that the spaceport could have operated in
a region already impacted by a growing population and emissions from offshore
oil platforms. In a press release, Bordonaro acknowledged writing the bill at the
request of the Western Commercial Space Center.
In 1997, Bordonaro joined State Sen. Jack O’Connel to author California
Assembly Bill 1475, which placed the California Spaceport Authority under the
California Space Technology Alliance to “promote changes in federal, state and
local statutes and regulations.” AB 1475 not only established a mechanism for
channeling public funds into the development of space-related commerce, it also
ensured the spaceport a unique place in the history of corporate welfare when it
declared SSI the only California business exempt from state sales tax.
Governor Pete Wilson signed AB 1475 into law in October 1997. Since then, a
new bill, AB 1765, has been introduced to remove sales taxes for all commercial
space activities in the state.
The Last, Best Hope
The California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) may prove to be the next
battle ground for political justice in this struggle. Existing laws have created a
Spaceport Office within CalTrans charged with the responsibility to work
cooperatively with the Western Commercial Space Center “to support rapid
development” of California’s space programs.
CalTrans is so entrenched in a pro-growth tradition that it likely will remain
beyond the ability of the Chumash or their allies to influence.
If CalTrans remains in the back pocket of military and civilian developers, the
next best option for opponents will probably be to approach the California Coastal
Commission (CCC). In 1997, Assembly Speaker Cruz Bustamante appointed four
new members to the commission. The appointments removed several pro-growth
members and gave the CCC an 8–4 environmental majority. Fortunately, the CCC
still has a lot to say about the environmental impact of spaceport operations on the
fragile California coast.
Perhaps environmental and no-growth interest groups can still persuade the
public to carefully examine the wisdom of the spaceport project, but if government
and industry are going to build a spaceport, then at least the price of developing
the facility should not include cultural genocide. Billions of dollars are at stake,
and clearly the Chumash deserve the public’s support in this classic battle between
corporate America and a relatively impoverished native population.
On June 25, 1968, David Brower wrote a forward to a book called Almost
Ancestors: The First Californians by Theodora Kroeber and Robert Heizer. He
spoke of the extermination of many of the First Californians and pondered the
tragedy of someone’s being the last person on Earth to speak an ancient native
language. “Perhaps we can wonder a moment what it might be like, for example,
to be the last man on Earth who could speak French,” Brower wrote. “Man has
been forgiven often for knowing not what he does. For the kind of error that wiped
out this kind of uniqueness, there cannot be much more forgiveness. There isn’t
enough of it left, any more, to let die or to kill or to poison or to pave over. Too
many species are down to the last that speak their language, and organic
wholeness will be lessened when they go, on whatever part of this planet they
inhabit. What lessens them, diminishes us….”
Sidebar: Footsteps to Heaven
Dr. John Anderson [janderson@nidlink.com,
expage.com/page/socialcom] is
an ethnohistorian and myghologist and the author of several books on Native
American mythology. This commentary was excerpted from Anderson’s soon-to-
be-released booklet, “Heavenly Pioneers: How America’s Commercial Space Race
is Fueling Attacks Against the American Indians” [available for $6.80 from
American Designs Publishing, Box 546, Kootenai, Idaho, 83840].